Sting’s chef driven to tears
Sting’s private chef for eight years has won a claim for unfair dismissal and now is pursuing damages for alleged sexual discrimination against the singer and his wife.
Jane Martin, 41, alleges she often had to travel 160 kilometres to cook a bowl of pasta for Sting’s son, according to a statement made to an employment tribunal in the UK.
The Mail on Sunday says Ms Martin’s full statement to the tribunal states: “I was often required to travel all the way from Wiltshire to Central London just to cook their youngest son a bowl of pasta, even with two nannies, two housekeepers and a butler already in attendance who were perfectly capable of producing such a mundane offering.”
The paper reports that when Ms Martin was pregnant and sick with gastro-enteritis she alleged that Sting’s wife Trudi Styler shouted: “Who the f*** does she think she is? She’s my chef in the UK. She needs to be available if I need her, or she should rethink her position.”
Ms Martin said the celebrity couple never cooked for themselves and employed at least two chefs, with one running up a kitchen bill of £500,000 in one year.
“Sunday lunch would include roast beef, roast chicken, a vegetarian option, two different stuffings, ten different vegetables, two different gravies and two different puddings, purely to cater for individual tastes,” she says.
“I was once required to catch a train (while seven months pregnant) to London simply to produce a soup and salad for Trudi,” says Ms Martin.
“This was when she was on the set for production of Love Soup [a 2005 BBC drama]. The train and taxi amounted to £74 each way and the overtime was £300″ – a total of £448.
Ms Martin says she was paid £28,000 to work “very demanding” 14-hour days, which included dietary fads and producing 50 no-expense-spared Christmas hampers to send to the couple’s friends, including Prince Charles.
Although she admits the couple gave her lavish gifts, she says her dismissal was engineered after she got pregnant.
Her unfair dismissal claim has been upheld, but the tribunal has yet to rule on the allegation of sexual discrimination.
Add comment 11 April 2007
Administrator unfairly dismissed after boss died
A Walsall administrator who ran a haulage firm on her own for seven weeks without pay after her boss was found dead by his 12-year-old son has won a claim for unfair dismissal.
Stephanie Lawn told Birmingham Employment Tribunal how 49-year-old Michael Wathall, who was managing director of ML Transport in Cannock, died suddenly from a heart attack at his Walsall home last July.
“Wathall’s son went to kiss him shortly before going to school and discovered he was lying on the bedroom floor dead,” she added. “The boy had been living with his father since Wathall and his wife Lee divorced six months before.”Lawn was awarded £3,731 by the Tribunal for unfair dismissal, unpaid wages and holiday pay.
She said Wathall had been a successful haulier the firm delivered everything from pallets to envelopes in the UK and abroad.
“Wathall died only hours after driving back from Spain following a delivery,” Lawn reported. “I loved my job and carried on running the business from my home after the funeral, dealing with orders and making arrangements for the drivers.
“I wrote to Wathall’s ex-wife to try to find out what was happening about the business and my future, but didn’t receive a reply.
“After running the business for seven weeks and not hearing anything I presumed I’d lost my job.”
Tribunal chairman Charles Saunby said the business could not have carried on after Wathall’s death, and his ex-wife’s failure to respond meant Lawn had been made redundant.
He was satisfied that she had been unfairly dismissed through redundancy and said her award included a 50% loading because no proper disciplinary and dismissal procedures had been carried out.
Add comment 11 April 2007
Employers ignorant of latest changes to employment law: maternity pay and right to request flexible working
Seven in 10 employers are unaware of laws that came into force this month, according to research. A well established employment consultancy has found that 71% of bosses did not know about changes to employment law.
According to the research there is widespread ignorance among employers with regard to the new regulations coming into force in April 2007.
Bosses simply have to be prepared, otherwise they are leaving themselves at risk of being taken to tribunal.
Add comment 11 April 2007
